Promonique
Promonique
TCI
TCI
EPR Subscription Banner
EPR Subscription Banner
Home » Guest Column » Thinner is better for solar cells

Thinner is better for solar cells

By March 4, 2020 11:54 am IST

Thinner is better for solar cells
.

Solar panel costs have dropped lately, but slimming down silicon wafers could lead to even lower costs and faster industry expansion.
Costs of solar panels have plummeted over the last several years, leading to rates of solar installations far greater than most analysts had expected. But with most of the potential areas for cost savings already pushed to the extreme, further cost reductions are becoming more challenging to find. Now, researchers at MIT and at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) have outlined a pathway to slash costs further, this time by slimming down the silicon cells themselves.

Thinner silicon cells have been explored before, especially around a dozen years ago when the cost of silicon peaked because of supply shortages. But this approach suffered from some difficulties: The thin silicon wafers were too brittle and fragile, leading to unacceptable levels of losses during the manufacturing process, and they had lower efficiency. The researchers said that there are now ways to begin addressing these challenges through the use of better handling equipment and some recent developments in solar cell architecture.

The new findings are detailed in a paper in the journal Energy and Environmental Science, co-authored by MIT postdoc Zhe Liu, professor of mechanical engineering Tonio Buonassisi, and five others at MIT and NREL. The researchers describe their approach as “technoeconomic”, stressing that at this point economic considerations are as crucial as the technological ones in achieving further improvements in affordability of solar panels.

Currently, 90 percent of the world’s solar panels are made from crystalline silicon, and the industry continues to grow at a rate of about 30 percent per year, the researchers said. Today’s silicon photovoltaic cells — the heart of these solar panels — are made from wafers of silicon that are 160 micrometres thick. But with improved handling methods, the researchers proposed that this could be shaved down to 100 micrometres — and eventually as little as 40 micrometres or less, which would only require one-fourth as much silicon for a given size of panel.

That could not only reduce the cost of the individual panels, but even more importantly it could allow for rapid expansion of solar panel manufacturing capacity. That’s because the expansion can be constrained by limits on how fast new plants can be built to produce the silicon crystal ingots that are then sliced thin to make the wafers. These plants, which are generally separate from the solar cell manufacturing plants themselves, tend to be capital-intensive and time-consuming to build, which could lead to a bottleneck in the rate of expansion of solar panel production. Reducing wafer thickness could potentially alleviate that problem, the researchers said.

The study looked at the efficiency levels of four variations of solar cell architecture, including passivated emitter and rear contact (PERC) cells and other advanced high-efficiency technologies, comparing their outputs at different thickness levels. The team found there was in fact little decline in performance down to thicknesses as low as 40 micrometres, using today’s improved manufacturing processes.

“We see that there’s this area (of the graphs of efficiency versus thickness) where the efficiency is flat,” Liu said, “and so that’s the region where you could potentially save some money.” Because of these advances in cell architecture, he said, “We really started to see that it was time to revisit the cost benefits.”

Changing over the huge panel manufacturing plants to adapt to the thinner wafers will be a time-consuming and expensive process, but the analysis shows the benefits can far outweigh the costs, Liu said. It will take time to develop the necessary equipment and procedures to allow for the thinner material, but with existing technology, he said, “It should be relatively simple to go down to 100 micrometres,” which would already provide some significant savings. Further improvements in technology such as better detection of microcracks before they grow could help reduce thicknesses further.

In the future, the thickness could potentially be reduced to as little as 15 micrometres, he said. New technologies that grow thin wafers of silicon crystal directly rather than slicing them from a larger cylinder could help enable such further thinning.

Advertising

EPR Android App Banner

For more information, contact:
David L. Chandler,MIT News Office
http://news.mit.edu/

Cookie Consent

We use cookies to personalize your experience. By continuing to visit this website you agree to our Terms & Conditions, Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy.

Tags: Guest Column
Android App
Android App
EPR eMagazine December 2024
EPR eMagazine December 2024
EPR eMagazine December 2024

Events

Elecxpo
Elecxpo
India Smart Utility Week
India Smart Utility Week
RenewX
RenewX

Our Sponsors

Amararaja
Amararaja
Ambica India
Ambica India
Rayzon Solar Pvt Ltd
Rayzon Solar Pvt Ltd
Om Technical Solutions
Om Technical Solutions
NBC Bearings
NBC Bearings
Nirmal
Nirmal
Aramco Asia
Aramco Asia
Meco Instruments Pvt Ltd
Meco Instruments Pvt Ltd
Lucy Electric
Lucy Electric
Elev8 Lift
Elev8 Lift
Synthesis Winding Technologies Pvt Ltd
Synthesis Winding Technologies Pvt Ltd
flir system
flir system
Omicron
Omicron
Polycab
Polycab
Electrotherment
Electrotherment
Aeron Composite Pvt Ltd
Aeron Composite Pvt Ltd
MENNEKES Electric India
MENNEKES Electric India
PRAMA HIKVISION INDIA
PRAMA HIKVISION INDIA
Automatic Electric Ltd
Automatic Electric Ltd